Daniel v. WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
32 A.3d 1260
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 5, 2011·No. 318 EAL 2011, 19 EAL 2011·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 5th day of December, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Whether the Superior Court erred in reversing the trial court’s grant of JNOV for Wyeth on [Respondents’] punitive damages claim under Pennsylvania law, where (a) the FDA extensively reviewed and approved the prescription drug at issue, the sufficiency of the testing for that drug, and the drug’s label warnings of the risk of breast cancer, (b) there was no evidence that Wyeth concealed information from or misled the FDA or knew that the risk of breast cancer was greater than disclosed in its warnings, and (c) the drug was extensively tested and studied by Wyeth and independent researchers?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Daniel v. WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., 32 A.3d 1260 (Pa. 2011).
32 A.3d 1260 (Daniel v. WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fecho v. Eli Lilly & Co.
914 F. Supp. 2d 130 (D. Massachusetts, 2012)