Daniel v. Woodcock

963 So. 2d 357, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13297, 2007 WL 2409454
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 27, 2007·No. No. 1D07-2514·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellants’ response, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED as premature. See Polk County v. Sofka, 702 So.2d 1243 (Fla.1997) (quashing decision of the appellate court because it lacked jurisdiction even though the stipulated final judgment had incorporated a settlement agreement, which expressly provided for jurisdiction in the appellate court); Lovett v. City of Jacksonville Beach, 187 So.2d 96, 99 (Fla. 1 st DCA 1966) (stating appellate court jurisdiction “cannot be conferred by stipulation or endowed by action of the court”); Irvine v. T. Southwood 1295, Inc., 948 So.2d 981 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Mass. Life Ins. Co. v. Crapo, 918 So.2d 393 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (holding pending claims are interrelated and the order is not immediately appealable partial final judgment even if different legal theories or additional facts are involved in the separate counts).

ALLEN, WOLF, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniel v. Woodcock, 963 So. 2d 357, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13297, 2007 WL 2409454 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

963 So. 2d 357 (Daniel v. Woodcock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Polk County v. Sofka
702 So. 2d 1243 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
Massachusetts Life Ins. Co. v. Crapo
918 So. 2d 393 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Lovett v. City of Jacksonville Beach
187 So. 2d 96 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Irvine v. T. Southwood 1295, Inc.
948 So. 2d 981 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)