Daniel v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Fourth Circuit

Daniel v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

571 F. App'x 197

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 9, 2014

DocketNo. 13-2426

StatusPublished

This text of 571 F. App'x 197 (Daniel v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniel v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 571 F. App'x 197 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

[198]*198Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sheri Daniel appeals the district court’s order dismissing, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), her state-law claims of fraud, intentional infliction of emotional distress, unjust enrichment, and quiet title. She also appeals the denial of her motion for leave to file a second amended complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI