Daniel v. Van Wye

Missouri Court of Appeals

Daniel v. Van Wye

466 S.W.3d 621, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 466, 2015 WL 1925212

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 28, 2015·No. WD 77612·Published

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam

Appellant Janet Daniel appeals from the Circuit Court of DeKalb County’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Respondents Janet M. Perry Van Wye, Michael Van Wye, and Rosalie E. Van Wye. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that Respondents established they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law; thus, the trial court did not err by granting summary judgment in Respondents’ favor. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam

Appellant Janet Daniel appeals from the Circuit Court of DeKalb County’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Respondents Janet M. Perry Van Wye, Michael Van Wye, and Rosalie E. Van Wye. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that Respondents established they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law; thus, the trial court did not err by granting summary judgment in Respondents’ favor. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Daniel v. Van Wye, 466 S.W.3d 621, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 466, 2015 WL 1925212 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

466 S.W.3d 621 (Daniel v. Van Wye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.