Daniel v. United States Post Office
This text of Daniel v. United States Post Office (Daniel v. United States Post Office) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
___________________________________ ) HABTAMU DANIEL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10-1635 (EGS) ) UNITED STATES POST OFFICE, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On October 4, 2010, defendant filed a motion to dismiss. In its October 26, 2010 Order,
the Court advised plaintiff, among other things, of his obligation to file an opposition or other
response to the motion. Further, the Order expressly warned plaintiff that, if he failed to file his
opposition by November 30, 2010, the Court would treat the motion as conceded. To date,
plaintiff neither has filed an opposition nor has requested additional time to do so. Accordingly,
the Court treats defendant’s motion as conceded.
An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
SIGNED: EMMET G. SULLIVAN United States District Judge
DATED: December 10, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel v. United States Post Office, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-v-united-states-post-office-dcd-2010.