Daniel v. Tucker

S.D. New York

Daniel v. Tucker

DecidedApril 24, 2020

Docket1:20-cv-02149

StatusUnknown

This text of Daniel v. Tucker (Daniel v. Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniel v. Tucker, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OTIS A. DANIEL, Plaintiff, -against- 1:20-CV-2149 (LLS) ROBERT S. TUCKER, ESQ.; STEVEN |. CIVIL JUDGMENT GUTSTEIN, Defendants. Pursuant to the order issued April 24, 2020, dismissing this action, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this action is dismissed. The Court denies Plaintiff any relief he seeks under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure from Judge Engelmayer’s July 19, 2018 Corrected Opinion & Order in Daniel v. T&M Prot. Res., LLC, No. 13-CV-4384, 2018 WL 3621810 (S.D.N.Y. July 19, 2018). The Court dismisses Plaintiff's remaining claims against Tucker and Gutstein under the doctrine of claim preclusion for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Chambers will mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. Dated: April 24, 2020 New York, New York Louis L. Stanton U.S.D.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OTIS A. DANIEL, Plaintiff, -against- 1:20-CV-2149 (LLS) ROBERT S. TUCKER, ESQ.; STEVEN |. CIVIL JUDGMENT GUTSTEIN, Defendants. Pursuant to the order issued April 24, 2020, dismissing this action, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this action is dismissed. The Court denies Plaintiff any relief he seeks under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure from Judge Engelmayer’s July 19, 2018 Corrected Opinion & Order in Daniel v. T&M Prot. Res., LLC, No. 13-CV-4384, 2018 WL 3621810 (S.D.N.Y. July 19, 2018). The Court dismisses Plaintiff's remaining claims against Tucker and Gutstein under the doctrine of claim preclusion for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Chambers will mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. Dated: April 24, 2020 New York, New York Louis L. Stanton U.S.D.J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Daniel v. Tucker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-v-tucker-nysd-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack