Daniel v. Trowbridge

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Allen David Daniel,

Plaintiff, Case No. 24-cv-10393

v. Judith E. Levy United States District Judge Beth Trowbridge, et al., Mag. Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [36]

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford’s Report and Recommendation recommending the Court grant Plaintiff Allen David Daniel’s request to dismiss the action against Defendant Bradley without prejudice. (ECF No. 36.) Bradley is currently the only Defendant remaining in the case. (See id. at PageID.424; ECF No. 26, PageID.384– 385.) The parties were required to file specific written objections, if any, within fourteen days of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(d). No objections were filed. The Court has nevertheless carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concurs in the result. Accordingly, The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 36) is ADOPTED; and The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Bradley.1

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 29, 2025 s/Judith E. Levy Ann Arbor, Michigan JUDITH E. LEVY United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF System to their respective email or first-class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on September 29, 2025.

s/William Barkholz WILLIAM BARKHOLZ Case Manager

1 By failing to object to the Report and Recommendation, the parties have forfeited any further right of appeal. United States v. Wandahsega, 924 F.3d 868, 878 (6th Cir. 2019); see also Berkshire v. Dahl, 928 F.3d 520, 530 (6th Cir. 2019).