Daniel v. Tallassee Power Co.

161 S.E. 210, 201 N.C. 680, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 64
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 18, 1931·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

*681 Pee, Oubiam.

Without regard to the correctness of the ruling on the demurrer, as the result reached was within the power and discretion of the trial court, and apparently no harm has come to the plaintiff, the judgment will not be disturbed.

It is not the practice of appellate courts to upset judgments, even though irregularly entered, where no harm has come to appellant, and none is likely to result from allowing the judgment to stand. Bank v. McCullers, ante, 440; Rankin v. Oates, 183 N. C., 517, 112 S. E., 32.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniel v. Tallassee Power Co., 161 S.E. 210, 201 N.C. 680, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 64 (N.C. 1931).

161 S.E. 210 (Daniel v. Tallassee Power Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Town of Bath v. Norman
39 S.E.2d 363 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)
Munday v. Bank of Franklin
189 S.E. 779 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)
In Re Will of Turnage
179 S.E. 332 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)