Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Daniel v. State

Daniel v. State

255 S.W. 444, 95 Tex. Crim. 649, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 741
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 10, 1923
DocketNo. 7565.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 255 S.W. 444 (Daniel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniel v. State, 255 S.W. 444, 95 Tex. Crim. 649, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 741 (Tex. 1923).

Opinions

Conviction is for the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of one year.

The motion of the State to dismiss the appeal must be sustained for the reason that the document denominated a recognizance is, in fact, a mere appearance bond complying in no respect with the terms of the statute prescribing the requisites of a recognizance or bond on appeal. See Code of Crim. Proc., Arts. 903 and 904; also Staten v. State, 93 Texas Crim Rep., 265, 246 S.W. Rep., 387 and cases therein collated.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

London v. State
739 S.W.2d 842 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Cox v. State
5 S.W.2d 521 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Berry v. State
282 S.W. 594 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 S.W. 444, 95 Tex. Crim. 649, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-v-state-texcrimapp-1923.