Daniel v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Daniel v. State

190 S.W.3d 388, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1923, 2005 WL 3527659

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 27, 2005

DocketED 85713

StatusPublished

This text of 190 S.W.3d 388 (Daniel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniel v. State, 190 S.W.3d 388, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1923, 2005 WL 3527659 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Robert E. Daniel, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Robert E. Daniel, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 S.W.3d 388, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1923, 2005 WL 3527659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-v-state-moctapp-2005.