Daniel v. State

146 S.E. 520, 39 Ga. App. 135, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 219
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1929
Docket19339
StatusPublished

This text of 146 S.E. 520 (Daniel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniel v. State, 146 S.E. 520, 39 Ga. App. 135, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 219 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

Under all the facts of the case as disclosed by the record, this court is unable to hold that the judge of the superior court abused his discretion in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 S.E. 520, 39 Ga. App. 135, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-v-state-gactapp-1929.