Daniel v. State
146 S.E. 520, 39 Ga. App. 135, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 219
Opinion
Under all the facts of the case as disclosed by the record, this court is unable to hold that the judge of the superior court abused his discretion in overruling the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Daniel v. State, 146 S.E. 520, 39 Ga. App. 135, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 219 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).
146 S.E. 520 (Daniel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.