Daniel v. State
97 S.E. 411, 23 Ga. App. 83, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 47
This text of 97 S.E. 411 (Daniel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Daniel v. State, 97 S.E. 411, 23 Ga. App. 83, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 47 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).
Opinion
1. The grounds of the motion for a new trial based upon objections to the admission of testimony being expressly disapproved by the trial judge, can not be considered.
2. The evidence connecting the defendant with the theft of the cow, as charged, together with the confessions, was sufficient to authorize the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
97 S.E. 411, 23 Ga. App. 83, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-v-state-gactapp-1918.