Daniel v. State
43 S.E. 861, 118 Ga. 16, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 417
Opinion
1. The refusal of the trial judge to follow the recommendation of the jury that one found guilty of assault with intent to murder be punished as for a misdemeanor is not cause for a new trial, as such recommendations are entirely subject to ^he approval of the court. Penal Code, § 1036; Echols v. State, 109 Ga. 510.
2. The evidence introduced by the State, while circumstantial in character and conflicting with that offered by the accused, was sufficient to support a conviction. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Daniel v. State, 43 S.E. 861, 118 Ga. 16, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 417 (Ga. 1903).
43 S.E. 861 (Daniel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johnson v. State
191 S.E.2d 614 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Harris v. State of Georgia
119 S.E.2d 352 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1961)
Varner v. State
108 S.E. 80 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Mack v. State
45 S.E. 603 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)