Daniel v. Social Security Administration
This text of Daniel v. Social Security Administration (Daniel v. Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) HABTAMU DANIEL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10-0345 (EGS) ) SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________________ )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On November 2, 2010, defendant filed a motion to dismiss. In its November 3, 2010
Order, the Court advised plaintiff, among other things, of his obligation to file an opposition or
other response to the motion. Further, the Order expressly warned plaintiff that, if he failed to
file his opposition by December 3, 2010, the Court would treat the motion as conceded. To date,
plaintiff neither has filed an opposition nor has requested additional time to do so. Accordingly,
the Court treats defendants’ motion as conceded.
An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
SIGNED: EMMET G. SULLIVAN United States District Judge
DATED: December 10, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel v. Social Security Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-v-social-security-administration-dcd-2010.