Daniel v. Sloan

Fourth Circuit

Daniel v. Sloan

695 F. App'x 729

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 21, 2017

DocketNo. 17-1524

StatusPublished

This text of 695 F. App'x 729 (Daniel v. Sloan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniel v. Sloan, 695 F. App'x 729 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

[730]*730Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sheri Daniel appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her civil action and denying her motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Daniel v. Sloan, No. 1:16-cv-01360-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va., Mar. 10 & 22, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[730]*730Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sheri Daniel appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her civil action and denying her motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Daniel v. Sloan, No. 1:16-cv-01360-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va., Mar. 10 & 22, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

695 F. App'x 729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-v-sloan-ca4-2017.