Home/Supreme Court/Daniel v. Pettway

Daniel v. Pettway

82 L. Ed. 2d 824, 104 S. Ct. 3515, 467 U.S. 1243, 34 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1688, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 2592, 34 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 34,424, 52 U.S.L.W. 3891
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 11, 1984
DocketNo. 83-1802
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 82 L. Ed. 2d 824 (Daniel v. Pettway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniel v. Pettway, 82 L. Ed. 2d 824, 104 S. Ct. 3515, 467 U.S. 1243, 34 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1688, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 2592, 34 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 34,424, 52 U.S.L.W. 3891 (U.S. 1984).

Opinion

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ray Wayne Beavers, Oscar D. Jenkins, and Terry Chaffin, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. American Cast Iron Pipe Company, Ray Wayne Beavers, Etc., James Dollar, Applicant in Intervention and a Member of the Putative Class v. American Cast Iron Pipe Company, Ray Wayne Beavers, Etc., Charles Harmon and Richard Johnson, Plaintiffs-Intervenor Movants-Appellants v. American Cast Iron Pipe Company
852 F.2d 527 (Eleventh Circuit, 1988)
Beavers v. American Cast Iron Pipe Co.
852 F.2d 527 (Eleventh Circuit, 1988)
Annette Cox v. American Cast Iron Pipe Company
847 F.2d 725 (Eleventh Circuit, 1988)
Cox v. American Cast Iron Pipe Co.
847 F.2d 725 (Eleventh Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 L. Ed. 2d 824, 104 S. Ct. 3515, 467 U.S. 1243, 34 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1688, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 2592, 34 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 34,424, 52 U.S.L.W. 3891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-v-pettway-scotus-1984.