Daniel v. Peake
275 F. App'x 951
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedMarch 12, 2008
DocketNo. 2006-7306
StatusPublished
This text of 275 F. App'x 951 (Daniel v. Peake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Daniel v. Peake, 275 F. App'x 951 (Fed. Cir. 2008).
Opinion
ORDER
On February 4, 2008 the court issued an order allowing Sidney T. Daniel (“Daniel”) 21 days to notify the court why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Daniel has failed to respond within the time allowed.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) This appeal is dismissed.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
275 F. App'x 951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-v-peake-cafc-2008.