Daniel v. Keen

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Daniel v. Keen

97 S.E. 444, 23 Ga. App. 105, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 66

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 23, 1918

Docket9810

StatusPublished

This text of 97 S.E. 444 (Daniel v. Keen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniel v. Keen, 97 S.E. 444, 23 Ga. App. 105, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 66 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial in this case is not in the record. However, the bill of exceptions, duly certified, recite^ that the motion for a new trial was submitted on the general grounds only. There is evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and this court can not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., concurs. Stephens, J., not presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial in this case is not in the record. However, the bill of exceptions, duly certified, recite^ that the motion for a new trial was submitted on the general grounds only. There is evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and this court can not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., concurs. Stephens, J., not presiding.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 S.E. 444, 23 Ga. App. 105, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-v-keen-gactapp-1918.