Daniel v. Green

199 So. 318, 145 Fla. 416, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 969
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 20, 1940
StatusPublished

This text of 199 So. 318 (Daniel v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniel v. Green, 199 So. 318, 145 Fla. 416, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 969 (Fla. 1940).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The opinion herein filed November 8, 1940, was recalled because the application for oral argument *417 was overlooked. The cause has been orally argued by counsel for both parties before the Court en banc. Upon a full consideration of the record and the briefs and arguments, the Court is of opinion that there is no material error in the final decree and it is ordered and adjudged that the final decree appealed from is hereby again affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Whitfield, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur. Justices Thomas and Adams not participating .as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 So. 318, 145 Fla. 416, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-v-green-fla-1940.