Daniel v. Green

Supreme Court of Florida

Daniel v. Green

199 So. 318, 145 Fla. 416, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 969

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 20, 1940·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The opinion herein filed November 8, 1940, was recalled because the application for oral argument *417 was overlooked. The cause has been orally argued by counsel for both parties before the Court en banc. Upon a full consideration of the record and the briefs and arguments, the Court is of opinion that there is no material error in the final decree and it is ordered and adjudged that the final decree appealed from is hereby again affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Whitfield, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur. Justices Thomas and Adams not participating .as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The opinion herein filed November 8, 1940, was recalled because the application for oral argument *417 was overlooked. The cause has been orally argued by counsel for both parties before the Court en banc. Upon a full consideration of the record and the briefs and arguments, the Court is of opinion that there is no material error in the final decree and it is ordered and adjudged that the final decree appealed from is hereby again affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Whitfield, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur. Justices Thomas and Adams not participating .as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Daniel v. Green, 199 So. 318, 145 Fla. 416, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 969 (Fla. 1940).

Pincite

199 So. 318 (Daniel v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.