Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Daniel v. Folk

Daniel v. Folk

57 A.D.3d 473, 867 N.Y.2d 921
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 2, 2008
StatusPublished

This text of 57 A.D.3d 473 (Daniel v. Folk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniel v. Folk, 57 A.D.3d 473, 867 N.Y.2d 921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Contrary to his contention, the plaintiff failed to present, at the inquest, sufficient evidence of his inability to secure gainful employment during the period between his dismissal from his former position in 2002 and his projected retirement at age 66 in 2018 to support his request for an award of damages in the amount of $759,279.04 (see generally Glaser v County of Orange, 54 AD3d 997 [2008]; Schiller v New York City Tr. Auth., 300 AD2d 296, 296-297 [2002]; Bailey v Jamaica Buses Co., 210 AD2d 192 [1994]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly rejected his request for an award of lost earnings in that amount. Mastro, J.E, Rivera, Fisher and Eng, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Glaser v. County of Orange
54 A.D.3d 997 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Bailey v. Jamaica Buses Co.
210 A.D.2d 192 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Schiller v. New York City Transit Authority
300 A.D.2d 296 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A.D.3d 473, 867 N.Y.2d 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-v-folk-nyappdiv-2008.