Daniel v. F. Bloom v. Willard C. Smith, Former Major, and Virginia Beach Correctional Center Frank Drew, Sheriff

Fourth Circuit

Daniel v. F. Bloom v. Willard C. Smith, Former Major, and Virginia Beach Correctional Center Frank Drew, Sheriff

59 F.3d 165, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23228, 1995 WL 370426

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 22, 1995

Docket95-6196

StatusPublished

This text of 59 F.3d 165 (Daniel v. F. Bloom v. Willard C. Smith, Former Major, and Virginia Beach Correctional Center Frank Drew, Sheriff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniel v. F. Bloom v. Willard C. Smith, Former Major, and Virginia Beach Correctional Center Frank Drew, Sheriff, 59 F.3d 165, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23228, 1995 WL 370426 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

59 F.3d 165
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Daniel
V.
F. BLOOM, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Willard C. SMITH, Former Major, Defendant--Appellee,
and
Virginia Beach Correctional Center; Frank Drew, Sheriff, Defendants.

No. 95-6196.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 22, 1995.

Daniel V.F. Bloom, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Douglas Stiles, WILLCOX & SAVAGE, Norfolk, VA, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bloom v. Smith, No. CA-92-114-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

59 F.3d 165
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Daniel
V.
F. BLOOM, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Willard C. SMITH, Former Major, Defendant--Appellee,
and
Virginia Beach Correctional Center; Frank Drew, Sheriff, Defendants.

No. 95-6196.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 22, 1995.

Daniel V.F. Bloom, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Douglas Stiles, WILLCOX & SAVAGE, Norfolk, VA, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bloom v. Smith, No. CA-92-114-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 F.3d 165, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23228, 1995 WL 370426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-v-f-bloom-v-willard-c-smith-former-major-an-ca4-1995.