Daniel v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Daniel v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance

151 S.E.2d 922, 114 Ga. App. 545, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 841

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 13, 1966

Docket42335

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 151 S.E.2d 922 (Daniel v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniel v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance, 151 S.E.2d 922, 114 Ga. App. 545, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 841 (Ga. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinions

Eberhardt, Judge.

An award in an application for hearing for determination as to whether the claimant had experienced a change of condition reciting that “the evidence does not show conclusively that his work incurred an aggravation of a preexisting condition and was the cause of claimant’s disability” is grounded upon an erroneous legal theory, and must be remanded to the board for a re-examination of the record and a new finding and award to be made in the light of the burden of the claimant to show his change of condition by a preponderance of the competent evidence.

Recital in the award of the full board, on an appeal from the deputy director’s findings and award, that “the majority of the full board is of the opinion that there is ample evidence to support the findings of the deputy director” does not alleviate the error, for the full board proceeded to make the findings of the deputy director its own and the award was made the award of the full board. The error was perpetuated.

Judgment reversed with direction that the matter he remanded for further action in accordance herewith.

Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eberhardt, Judge.

An award in an application for hearing for determination as to whether the claimant had experienced a change of condition reciting that “the evidence does not show conclusively that his work incurred an aggravation of a preexisting condition and was the cause of claimant’s disability” is grounded upon an erroneous legal theory, and must be remanded to the board for a re-examination of the record and a new finding and award to be made in the light of the burden of the claimant to show his change of condition by a preponderance of the competent evidence.

Recital in the award of the full board, on an appeal from the deputy director’s findings and award, that “the majority of the full board is of the opinion that there is ample evidence to support the findings of the deputy director” does not alleviate the error, for the full board proceeded to make the findings of the deputy director its own and the award was made the award of the full board. The error was perpetuated.

Judgment reversed with direction that the matter he remanded for further action in accordance herewith.

Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 S.E.2d 922, 114 Ga. App. 545, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-v-employers-mutual-liability-insurance-gactapp-1966.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack