Daniel v. Crawford

Missouri Court of Appeals

Daniel v. Crawford

284 S.W.3d 605, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 123, 2009 WL 230560

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 3, 2009

DocketWD 69609

StatusPublished

This text of 284 S.W.3d 605 (Daniel v. Crawford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniel v. Crawford, 284 S.W.3d 605, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 123, 2009 WL 230560 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

*606 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

William Daniel appeals from a judgment on the pleadings to Larry Crawford, Director of the Missouri Department of Corrections, in a declaratory judgment action filed by Daniel. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that, viewing all well-pleaded facts in the petition to be true, the Department of Corrections is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value, but a memorandum explaining oui* reasoning has been sent to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*606 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

William Daniel appeals from a judgment on the pleadings to Larry Crawford, Director of the Missouri Department of Corrections, in a declaratory judgment action filed by Daniel. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that, viewing all well-pleaded facts in the petition to be true, the Department of Corrections is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value, but a memorandum explaining oui* reasoning has been sent to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 S.W.3d 605, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 123, 2009 WL 230560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-v-crawford-moctapp-2009.