Daniel v. Crawford

Missouri Court of Appeals

Daniel v. Crawford

284 S.W.3d 605, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 123, 2009 WL 230560

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 3, 2009·No. WD 69609·Published

Opinion

*606 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

William Daniel appeals from a judgment on the pleadings to Larry Crawford, Director of the Missouri Department of Corrections, in a declaratory judgment action filed by Daniel. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that, viewing all well-pleaded facts in the petition to be true, the Department of Corrections is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value, but a memorandum explaining oui* reasoning has been sent to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*606 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

William Daniel appeals from a judgment on the pleadings to Larry Crawford, Director of the Missouri Department of Corrections, in a declaratory judgment action filed by Daniel. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that, viewing all well-pleaded facts in the petition to be true, the Department of Corrections is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value, but a memorandum explaining oui* reasoning has been sent to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Daniel v. Crawford, 284 S.W.3d 605, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 123, 2009 WL 230560 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

284 S.W.3d 605 (Daniel v. Crawford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.