Daniel v. Commonwealth
This text of 311 S.W.2d 384 (Daniel v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, Dennis “Hoodley” Daniel, was convicted of selling intoxicating beverages in dry local option territory and was fined $50 and sentenced to 60 days in jail.
He contends that the court erred in failing to set aside the swearing of the jury and [385]*385continue the case upon the ground that he was surprised when a principal witness for the prosecution changed his testimony from that which he had given at a previous trial. Under the circumstances of this case, we find that the court properly refused such action.
The motion for appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
311 S.W.2d 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1957.