Daniel v. Commonwealth
Opinion
Appellant, Dennis “Hoodley” Daniel, was convicted of selling intoxicating beverages in dry local option territory and was fined $50 and sentenced to 60 days in jail.
He contends that the court erred in failing to set aside the swearing of the jury and [385] continue the case upon the ground that he was surprised when a principal witness for the prosecution changed his testimony from that which he had given at a previous trial. Under the circumstances of this case, we find that the court properly refused such action.
The motion for appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
311 S.W.2d 384 (Daniel v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.