Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Daniel v. Columbus Fertilizer Co.

Daniel v. Columbus Fertilizer Co.

22 S.E. 904, 96 Ga. 775
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 13, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 22 S.E. 904 (Daniel v. Columbus Fertilizer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniel v. Columbus Fertilizer Co., 22 S.E. 904, 96 Ga. 775 (Ga. 1895).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

The facts alleged, in the plaintiff’s petition to marshal the assets of the estate of his intestate showed sufficient doubt and uncertainty as to the legal priority of the several claims against the estate, and enough complication in its affairs, to make the filing of the petition proper. This being so, it was not without equity, and it was error to dismiss it upon demurrer.

Judgment reversed.

J. A. Anslby, for plaintiff. J, II. Lumpkin, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hudson v. Tate
4 S.E.2d 577 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Hamrick v. Prewett
164 S.E. 678 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 S.E. 904, 96 Ga. 775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-v-columbus-fertilizer-co-ga-1895.