Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Daniel v. Bennett

Daniel v. Bennett

135 S.E. 496, 36 Ga. App. 91, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 780
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 9, 1926
Docket17533
StatusPublished

This text of 135 S.E. 496 (Daniel v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniel v. Bennett, 135 S.E. 496, 36 Ga. App. 91, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 780 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Beoyles, C. J.

The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial show no cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness. Claude Christopher, for plaintiff. Willingham & Willingham, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 S.E. 496, 36 Ga. App. 91, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-v-bennett-gactapp-1926.