Daniel v. Belin

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 566
CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina
DecidedJuly 1, 1766
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 566 (Daniel v. Belin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniel v. Belin, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 566 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1766).

Opinion

March 9, 1768. Bill sets forth that a grant of 500 acres was made by the lords proprietors to Peter Caulton; that a transfer of 300 acres thereof was made to John Bee, and the remaining 200 acres to James Belin, father of the defendants; that a contract in writing was made by James Belin to convey the said 200 acres to the plaintiff’s father85 upon the latter’s bond of £200. The bill further sets forth the claim that the plaintiff’s father paid £313 on a debt of James Belin, and that Belin delivered up full possession of the 200 acres, along with conveyances and the original grant for 500 acres; but that the defendants had the 500 acres surveyed, attempted to obtain a grant, and still claim and occupy the land. Bill seeks to cancel the fraudulent grant defendants obtained, and the execution of proper deeds to the plaintiff, and such other relief as the court may decree.

(Bundle 1767-1770)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-v-belin-ctchansc-1766.