Daniel v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Daniel v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.

91 S.E. 230, 19 Ga. App. 120, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 7

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 23, 1917

Docket7405

StatusPublished

This text of 91 S.E. 230 (Daniel v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniel v. American Agricultural Chemical Co., 91 S.E. 230, 19 Ga. App. 120, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 7 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

George, J.

The defendant’s answer was stricken on demurrer on the 15th day of December,- 1915, and a judgment for the plaintiff rendered. Timely exceptions pendente lite were taken to the order sustaining the demurrer and striking the answer. A bill of exceptions was tendered to and certified by the presiding judge on the 4th day of April, 1916. No motion for new trial was made, and no exception taken to the rendition of the final judgment. Held: The motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions must be sustained.

Writ of error dismissed.

Wade, - O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George, J.

The defendant’s answer was stricken on demurrer on the 15th day of December,- 1915, and a judgment for the plaintiff rendered. Timely exceptions pendente lite were taken to the order sustaining the demurrer and striking the answer. A bill of exceptions was tendered to and certified by the presiding judge on the 4th day of April, 1916. No motion for new trial was made, and no exception taken to the rendition of the final judgment. Held: The motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions must be sustained.

Writ of error dismissed.

Wade, - O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 S.E. 230, 19 Ga. App. 120, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-v-american-agricultural-chemical-co-gactapp-1917.