Daniel Tulloch v. State

145 So. 3d 901, 2014 WL 3928400, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12437
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 13, 2014·No. 4D14-1733·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s amended claim seven following our remand in Tulloch v. State, 86 So.3d 1155 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). The deposition transcripts conclusively refute appellant’s claim. Appellant has attempted to raise additional claims which exceed the scope of our remand. These claims are procedurally barred and were properly denied.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniel Tulloch v. State, 145 So. 3d 901, 2014 WL 3928400, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12437 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

145 So. 3d 901 (Daniel Tulloch v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tulloch v. State
86 So. 3d 1155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)