Daniel Tulloch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Daniel Tulloch v. State

145 So. 3d 901, 2014 WL 3928400, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12437

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 13, 2014

Docket4D14-1733

StatusPublished

This text of 145 So. 3d 901 (Daniel Tulloch v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniel Tulloch v. State, 145 So. 3d 901, 2014 WL 3928400, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12437 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s amended claim seven following our remand in Tulloch v. State, 86 So.3d 1155 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). The deposition transcripts conclusively refute appellant’s claim. Appellant has attempted to raise additional claims which exceed the scope of our remand. These claims are procedurally barred and were properly denied.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s amended claim seven following our remand in Tulloch v. State, 86 So.3d 1155 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). The deposition transcripts conclusively refute appellant’s claim. Appellant has attempted to raise additional claims which exceed the scope of our remand. These claims are procedurally barred and were properly denied.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 So. 3d 901, 2014 WL 3928400, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-tulloch-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack