DANIEL THOMAS ARCURI v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of DANIEL THOMAS ARCURI v. STATE OF FLORIDA (DANIEL THOMAS ARCURI v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DANIEL THOMAS ARCURI, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D19-1794
[January 16, 2020]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Michael Heisey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 47-2016-CF-000468-B.
Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Paul O’Neil, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Fourth District, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
GROSS, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
DANIEL THOMAS ARCURI v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-thomas-arcuri-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2020.