Daniel Shaw v. State
This text of Daniel Shaw v. State (Daniel Shaw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed January 27, 2020
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-01406-CR
DANIEL SHAW, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F19-56007-R
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Whitehill, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Whitehill Daniel Shaw filed a pro se notice of appeal on November 14, 2019. The clerk’s record,
filed December 23, 2019, shows appellant was indicted for evading arrest. On October 24, 2019,
the State filed a motion to dismiss prosecution which the trial court granted. Thus, it appears
appellant is trying to appeal the trial court’s order dismissing the case.
In Texas, appeals in criminal cases are permitted only when they are authorized by statute.
State ex rel. Lykos, 330 S.W.3d 904, 915 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011); see TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.
ANN. art. 44.02. Generally, a criminal defendant may only appeal from a final judgment. See State
v. Sellers, 790 S.W.2d 316, 321 n.4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990). A “final judgment” is a “final
judgment of conviction,” which is defined in the Code of Criminal Procedure as “the written
declaration of the court signed by the trial judge and entered of record showing the conviction or acquittal of the defendant.” Raley v. State, 441 S.W.3d 647, 650 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]
2014, pet ref’d); TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 42.01, § 1. Appellant was not convicted or
acquitted in trial court cause number F19-56007-R. Rather, the State filed a motion to dismiss the
case against him which the trial court granted.
Because this appeal does not fall within the exceptions to the general rule that appeal may
be taken only from a final judgment of conviction, we conclude we have no jurisdiction.
We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
/Bill Whitehill/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b) 191406F.U05
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
DANIEL SHAW, Appellant On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-19-01406-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F19-56007-R. Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Bridges and Nowell participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Judgment entered January 27, 2020.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel Shaw v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-shaw-v-state-texapp-2020.