Daniel Sanchez v. State
This text of Daniel Sanchez v. State (Daniel Sanchez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 27, 2004
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
The trial court imposed sentence on Daniel Sanchez in these cases on November 19, 2003, and appellant timely filed a motion for new trial. Thus, the notices of appeal was due February 17, 2004, or the notices, together with motions for extension of time to file, were due fifteen days later on March 3, 2004. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2), 26.3. The record in each appeal contains a notice of appeal filed April 29, 2004. Sanchez did not file a motion for extension of time to file the notices of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3.
Because the notices of appeal in these cases were not timely filed, we lack jurisdiction to entertain the appeals. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (explaining that writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure governs out-of-time appeals from felony convictions). Accordingly, we dismiss these appeals for want of jurisdiction.
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Daniel Sanchez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-sanchez-v-state-texapp-2004.