Daniel S. v. Behlke
39 A.3d 991, 614 Pa. 689, 2012 WL 661788, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 461
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 1st day of March, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. Petitioner’s Application for Leave to File a Reply Brief, Leave to File Post Submission Communication and Application for Post Submission Communication in the Nature of Filing a Reply Brief are DISMISSED AS MOOT.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Daniel S. v. Behlke, 39 A.3d 991, 614 Pa. 689, 2012 WL 661788, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 461 (Pa. 2012).
39 A.3d 991 (Daniel S. v. Behlke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thattayathu v. Trikha
33 Pa. D. & C.5th 347 (Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas, 2013)
Shields v. Fafard
33 Pa. D. & C.5th 28 (Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas, 2013)