Daniel S. Parks and Suzanne Parks v. DeWitt County Electric Cooperative, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 4, 2004
Docket13-04-00045-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Daniel S. Parks and Suzanne Parks v. DeWitt County Electric Cooperative, Inc. (Daniel S. Parks and Suzanne Parks v. DeWitt County Electric Cooperative, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniel S. Parks and Suzanne Parks v. DeWitt County Electric Cooperative, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-04-045-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________


DANIEL S. PARKS AND SUZANNE PARKS,                        Appellants,


v.


DEWITT COUNTY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.,                Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________


On appeal from the 267th District Court

of DeWitt County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellants, DANIEL S. PARKS AND SUZANNE PARKS, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 267th District Court of DeWitt County, Texas, in cause number 91-2-15,519. Judgment in this cause was signed on October 13, 2003. A timely motion for new trial was filed on November 12, 2003. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellants’ notice of appeal was due on January 12, 2004, but was not filed until January 30, 2004. Appellants’ untimely motion to extend time to file notice of appeal was received in this Court on January 28, 2004. Appellee’s response to appellant’s motion was received on February 4, 2004.

         The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellants’ failure to timely perfect their appeal, appellants’ untimely motion to extend time to file notice of appeal, and appellee’s response thereto, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellants’ untimely motion to extend time to file notice of appeal is DENIED. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

                                                               PER CURIAM



Opinion delivered and filed this

the 4th day of March, 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Daniel S. Parks and Suzanne Parks v. DeWitt County Electric Cooperative, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-s-parks-and-suzanne-parks-v-dewitt-county-e-texapp-2004.