Daniel Robert Northcutt v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 27, 2019
Docket05-18-00618-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Daniel Robert Northcutt v. State (Daniel Robert Northcutt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniel Robert Northcutt v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed March 27, 2019.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00618-CR

DANIEL ROBERT NORTHCUTT, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401-83203-2017

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Partida-Kipness, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness Appellant Daniel Robert Northcutt waived a jury trial and pleaded guilty to manslaughter.

The trial court assessed punishment at seventeen years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s

attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The

brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a

professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to

advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978) (determining

whether brief meets requirements of Anders). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant.

We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response.

See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (noting appellant has right to

file pro se response to Anders brief filed by counsel). We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,

826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the

appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support

the appeal.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/Robbie Partida-Kipness/ ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS JUSTICE

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47 180618F.U05

–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

DANIEL ROBERT NORTHCUTT, On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Appellant Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401-83203-2017. No. 05-18-00618-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Partida- Kipness. Justices Bridges and Carlyle THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered this 27th day of March, 2019.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Bledsoe v. State
178 S.W.3d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
High v. State
573 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)
Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Daniel Robert Northcutt v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-robert-northcutt-v-state-texapp-2019.