Daniel Pettijohn Wisda v. Hollie Marie Wisda

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-18-00289-CV

____________________

DANIEL PETTIJOHN WISDA, Appellant V.

HOLLIE MARIE WISDA, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the 410th District Court Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 17-05-06175 ________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On August 2, 2018, we notified the parties that the notice of appeal did not appear to have been timely filed. The appellant, Daniel Pettijohn Wisda, did not file a response.

The trial court signed the judgment on March 22, 2018. By filing a motion for new trial within thirty days of the date of the judgment, Wisda extended the time for perfecting his appeal to June 20, 2018. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(1). Wisda filed a notice of appeal on July 30, 2018, but by that date his notice was untimely and

2

outside the period for which we may extend the appellate deadline that applies to Wisda’s case. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(1), 26.3. Thus, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________

HOLLIS HORTON

Justice

Submitted on August 29, 2018 Opinion Delivered August 30, 2018

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.