Daniel Pedraza v. Arkansas Department of Correction

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 17, 2026
Docket25-2490
StatusUnpublished

This text of Daniel Pedraza v. Arkansas Department of Correction (Daniel Pedraza v. Arkansas Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniel Pedraza v. Arkansas Department of Correction, (8th Cir. 2026).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 25-2490 ___________________________

Daniel Pedraza

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Arkansas Department of Correction; G. Musselwhite, Warden, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Cummins Unit; Robert L. Pierce, Deputy Warden of Security, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Cummins Unit; Darren Dill, Lieutenant/Sergeant, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Cummins Unit; Marshall Dale Reed, Chief Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections; Lewis Young, Deputy Warden of Operations, Arkansas Department of Corrections; WellPath, Health Care Provider, Cummins Unit; Lerizza Nunag, Provider/Nurse, Wellpath, Cummins Unit

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central ____________

Submitted: February 11, 2026 Filed: February 17, 2026 [Unpublished] ____________

Before GRUENDER, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Daniel Pedraza appeals after the district court1 dismissed some of his claims pre-service, denied his request for appointed counsel, and adversely granted summary judgment as to his remaining claims. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Johnson v. Carroll, 658 F.3d 819, 825 (8th Cir. 2011) (reviewing de novo grant of summary judgment); Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (reviewing de novo 28 U.S.C. § 1915A dismissal); see also Patterson v. Kelley, 902 F.3d 845, 849-50 (8th Cir. 2018) (reviewing the denial of counsel for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the reports and recommendations of the Honorable Benecia Moore and Honorable J. Thomas Ray, United States Magistrate Judges for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Carroll
658 F.3d 819 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)
Patric Patterson v. Kennie Bolden
902 F.3d 845 (Eighth Circuit, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Daniel Pedraza v. Arkansas Department of Correction, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-pedraza-v-arkansas-department-of-correction-ca8-2026.