Daniel P. Murphy v. Hoyt C. Cupp

Ninth Circuit

Daniel P. Murphy v. Hoyt C. Cupp

479 F.2d 1327

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 12, 1973

Docket71-2203

StatusPublished

This text of 479 F.2d 1327 (Daniel P. Murphy v. Hoyt C. Cupp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniel P. Murphy v. Hoyt C. Cupp, 479 F.2d 1327 (9th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

In a previous opinion concerning the subject cause, we reversed the judgment of the District Court. Murphy v. Cupp, 461 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1972). Thereafter, the appellee’s petition for certiorari was granted, and the Supreme Court, reversing our judgment, has now remanded the cause to this court, “for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of this Court.” Cupp v. Murphy, 412 U.S. 291, 93 S.Ct. 2000, 36 L.Ed. 2d 900 (1973).

The Supreme Court’s mandate has now issued. Pursuant to that mandate, we now hold that the District Court’s judgment should be, and it hereby is,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI