Daniel P. Hargrove v. C. Capela, 6022

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
• Decided: February 4, 2020
• Docket: 19-11910
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 19-11910 Date Filed: 02/04/2020 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________

No. 19-11910 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cv-00971-AT

DANIEL P. HARGROVE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

C. CAPELA, #6022; Atlanta Police Department Inc., ERIKA SHIELDS,

Defendants-Appellees.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ________________________

(February 4, 2020)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, LAGOA and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Case: 19-11910 Date Filed: 02/04/2020 Page: 2 of 2

Daniel Hargrove appeals pro se the dismissal without prejudice of his

complaint for failure to comply with an order to submit an amended application to

proceed in forma pauperis or to pay a filing fee. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. Hargrove

disregarded a warning that his failure to comply with the order would result in the

dismissal of his complaint, and he failed to object to a magistrate judge’s

recommendation to dismiss. On appeal, Hargrove has abandoned any challenge to

the dismissal by failing to identify an error by the district court. See Hamilton v.

Southland Christian Sch., Inc., 680 F.3d 1316, 1318–19 (11th Cir. 2012). Instead,

he demands that we enter judgment in his favor. Because Hargrove fails to explain

how the district court abused its discretion when it dismissed his complaint without

prejudice, see Dynes v. Army Air Force Exch. Serv., 720 F.2d 1495, 1499 (11th

Cir. 1983), we affirm.

AFFIRMED.