Daniel Ortega v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 30, 2015·No. 04-15-00523-CR·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00523-CR

Daniel ORTEGA,

Appellant

v.

The State

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 11, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 436539

The Honorable Tommy Stolhandske, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 30, 2015 DISMISSED On August 31, 2015, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record within thirty days. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 175-76 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order). Appellant did not file an amended certification or otherwise respond. The clerk’s record does not contain a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal. To the contrary, the trial court certification in the record states “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the

04-15-00523-CR

defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record shows the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. Therefore, the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification that defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniel Ortega v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Daniel Ortega v. State (Daniel Ortega v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)