Daniel Ornamental Iron Co. v. Black

Supreme Court of Alabama

Daniel Ornamental Iron Co. v. Black

259 So. 2d 295, 288 Ala. 736, 1972 Ala. LEXIS 1303

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedMarch 9, 1972

Docket6 Div. 864

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 259 So. 2d 295 (Daniel Ornamental Iron Co. v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniel Ornamental Iron Co. v. Black, 259 So. 2d 295, 288 Ala. 736, 1972 Ala. LEXIS 1303 (Ala. 1972).

Pincite

Opinions

HARWOOD, Justice.

The petition for a writ of certiorari was of course accompanied by a brief in petitioner’s behalf. No brief was received in opposition to the petition.

Having read petitioner’s brief and the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, 259 So.2d 291, we felt that a full review should be accorded the petitioner and accordingly granted the writ and set the cause down for argument, there being unusual facets in this case.

Having heard the arguments of respective counsel, and studied their briefs, we have concluded that the conclusion of the Court of Civil Appeals is correct under the facts and the posture of the case made by the decree of the trial court. It follows [738]*738that the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is due to be affirmed and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

LAWSON, MERRILL, COLEMAN, BLOODWORTH, MADDOX and McCALL, JJ., concur. HÉFLIN, C. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI