Daniel Mills v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 21, 2016
Docket16-3122
StatusPublished

This text of Daniel Mills v. State of Florida (Daniel Mills v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniel Mills v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

DANIEL MILLS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D16-3122

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed August 4, 2016.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original Jurisdiction.

Daniel Mills, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the

merits.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Daniel Mills v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-mills-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2016.