Daniel Miller Co. v. Edwards

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Daniel Miller Co. v. Edwards

118 S.E. 500, 30 Ga. App. 612, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 554

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 10, 1923

Docket14593

StatusPublished

This text of 118 S.E. 500 (Daniel Miller Co. v. Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniel Miller Co. v. Edwards, 118 S.E. 500, 30 Ga. App. 612, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 554 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The writ of error in this ease is here to test the judgment granting the defendant’s first motion for a new trial. The motion for a new trial is based upon the usual general grounds and upon the special grounds that the court erred in refusing a continuance of the case, and in directing a verdict for the plaintiff. The judgment granting the motion is general in its nature. Under all the facts of this case, this court cannot [613]*613say that the court abused its discretion in granting the motion for a new trial.-

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The writ of error in this ease is here to test the judgment granting the defendant’s first motion for a new trial. The motion for a new trial is based upon the usual general grounds and upon the special grounds that the court erred in refusing a continuance of the case, and in directing a verdict for the plaintiff. The judgment granting the motion is general in its nature. Under all the facts of this case, this court cannot [613]*613say that the court abused its discretion in granting the motion for a new trial.-

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 S.E. 500, 30 Ga. App. 612, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-miller-co-v-edwards-gactapp-1923.