Daniel Masarik v. United States

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Daniel Masarik v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 630 F. App'x 630
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided February 1, 2016·No. 15-1636·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

February 1, 2016

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

No. 15-­‐‑1636 Appeal from the United States District Court for DANIEL L. MASARIK, the Eastern District of Petitioner-­‐‑Appellant, Wisconsin. v. No. 11-­‐‑C-­‐‑0048 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, C.N. Clevert, Jr., Judge. Respondent-­‐‑Appellee.

Order

The court amends the order issued on January 21, 2016, by changing one sentence on page 2. “Co-­‐‑defendant Bartlett made a statement to the FBI, and the prosecutor did not give Masarik’s lawyer a copy.” is changed to read: “Co-­‐‑ defendant Bartlett made a statement to the FBI, and Masarik contends that the prosecutor did not give his lawyer a copy.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniel Masarik v. United States, (7th Cir. 2016).

Daniel Masarik v. United States (Daniel Masarik v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.