Daniel Mark Siegel and Associated Students of University of California (a.s.u.c.) v. Regents of the University of California
This text of 449 F.2d 788 (Daniel Mark Siegel and Associated Students of University of California (a.s.u.c.) v. Regents of the University of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Although the issue is close, we hold that the record before us presents a substantial federal question of constitutional stature. Consequently, the judgment of the lower court, 308 F.Supp. 832, is set aside and the cause remanded with instructions to convene a three-judge Court pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2281.
We express no opinion as to the ultimate resolution of the constitutional issues.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
449 F.2d 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-mark-siegel-and-associated-students-of-university-of-california-ca9-1971.