Daniel Mark Siegel and Associated Students of University of California (a.s.u.c.) v. Regents of the University of California

449 F.2d 788
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 19, 1971
Docket25262_1
StatusPublished

This text of 449 F.2d 788 (Daniel Mark Siegel and Associated Students of University of California (a.s.u.c.) v. Regents of the University of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daniel Mark Siegel and Associated Students of University of California (a.s.u.c.) v. Regents of the University of California, 449 F.2d 788 (9th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Although the issue is close, we hold that the record before us presents a substantial federal question of constitutional stature. Consequently, the judgment of the lower court, 308 F.Supp. 832, is set aside and the cause remanded with instructions to convene a three-judge Court pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2281.

We express no opinion as to the ultimate resolution of the constitutional issues.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Siegel v. Regents of the University of California
308 F. Supp. 832 (N.D. California, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
449 F.2d 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-mark-siegel-and-associated-students-of-university-of-california-ca9-1971.