Daniel Mark Siegel and Associated Students of University of California (a.s.u.c.) v. Regents of the University of California

Ninth Circuit

Daniel Mark Siegel and Associated Students of University of California (a.s.u.c.) v. Regents of the University of California

449 F.2d 788

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 19, 1971·No. 25262_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Although the issue is close, we hold that the record before us presents a substantial federal question of constitutional stature. Consequently, the judgment of the lower court, 308 F.Supp. 832, is set aside and the cause remanded with instructions to convene a three-judge Court pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2281.

We express no opinion as to the ultimate resolution of the constitutional issues.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Although the issue is close, we hold that the record before us presents a substantial federal question of constitutional stature. Consequently, the judgment of the lower court, 308 F.Supp. 832, is set aside and the cause remanded with instructions to convene a three-judge Court pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2281.

We express no opinion as to the ultimate resolution of the constitutional issues.

Daniel Mark Siegel and Associated Students of University of California (a.s.u.c.) v. Regents of the University of California, 449 F.2d 788 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

449 F.2d 788 (Daniel Mark Siegel and Associated Students of University of California (a.s.u.c.) v. Regents of the University of California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related