Daniel Marion Schroyer v. L. T. Lester Marci Ornealas Tein Duc Ngyen, Jane Smith Nurse Black Nurse Hines Nurse Plummer Nurse Dutmuhumer
This text of 16 F.3d 411 (Daniel Marion Schroyer v. L. T. Lester Marci Ornealas Tein Duc Ngyen, Jane Smith Nurse Black Nurse Hines Nurse Plummer Nurse Dutmuhumer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
16 F.3d 411
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Daniel Marion SCHROYER, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
L. T. LESTER; Marci Ornealas; Tein Duc Ngyen, Jane Smith;
Nurse Black; Nurse Hines; Nurse Plummer; Nurse
Dutmuhumer, Defendants Appellees.
No. 93-7152.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Jan. 20, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
Karen Lynn Lebo, Richmond, VA.
John Baldwin Catlett, Joe Thompson Cravens, Carlyle Randolph Wimbish, Sands, Anderson, Marks & Miller, Richmond, VA.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant filed suit under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988). The district court assessed a filing fee pursuant to Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and directed the Appellant to pay the fee or explain any withdrawals or circumstances warranting excuse from payment. When Appellant failed to obey this order, the district court dismissed the case without prejudice. Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93 (4th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1084 (1990). Appellant appeals.* Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Appellant also appeals from the order denying his motion that the district court judge recuse herself. Because Appellant failed to show a personal bias resulting from an extra-judicial source, In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir.1987), we affirm this order
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 F.3d 411, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7306, 1994 WL 11994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-marion-schroyer-v-l-t-lester-marci-ornealas-ca4-1994.