Daniel Maldonado v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 6, 2011·No. 03-10-00733-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN




NO. 03-10-00733-CR

Daniel Maldonado, Appellant



v.



The State of Texas, Appellee



FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY, 421ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 2004-203, HONORABLE TODD A. BLOMERTH, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant's brief was due in this Court on January 3, 2011. On February 3, we notified appellant's counsel that appellant's brief was overdue and that if we did not receive a satisfactory response from counsel on or before February 14, 2011, a hearing before the district court pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b) would be ordered. To date, appellant's brief has not been filed, nor have we received a response from counsel.

We therefore abate the cause and remand it to the district court to hold a hearing in accordance with rule 38.8 of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). The district court shall hold a hearing immediately to determine whether appellant still wishes to prosecute his appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and whether counsel has abandoned the appeal. See id. If appellant desires to appeal and is indigent, the district court should make appropriate orders to ensure that appellant is adequately represented on appeal. See id. Following the hearing, the district court should order the appropriate supplementary clerk's and reporter's records to be prepared and forwarded to this Court no later than May 6, 2011. See id.



Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose

Abated

Filed: April 6, 2011

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniel Maldonado v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Daniel Maldonado v. State (Daniel Maldonado v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.