Daniel M. Morgan v. United States of America, Alfred Ziegele v. United States of America, Herbert L. Nolte v. United States
This text of 389 F.2d 713 (Daniel M. Morgan v. United States of America, Alfred Ziegele v. United States of America, Herbert L. Nolte v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
389 F.2d 713
Daniel M. MORGAN, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Alfred ZIEGELE, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Herbert L. NOLTE, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Nos. 20715, 20733, 20734.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 7, 1968.
James F. Hewitt (argued), George L. Cooke (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.
Philip Wilens, Allan Streller, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before HAMLIN, MERRILL and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The three appellants were convicted under an indictment charging them with violating 26 U.S.C. 7201, by wilfully and knowingly attempting to evade and defeat the tax imposed by 26 U.S.C. 4401. The judgment of conviction cannot stand. Grosso v. United States, 1968, 390 U.S. 62, 88 S.Ct. 709, 19 L.Ed.2d 906, and see Marchetti v. United States, 1968, 390 U.S. 39, 88 S.Ct. 697, 19 L.Ed.2d 889.
Each judgment is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
389 F.2d 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-m-morgan-v-united-states-of-america-alfred-ziegele-v-united-ca9-1968.