DANIEL LYTLE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
DANIEL LYTLE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3906 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________)
Opinion filed February 21, 2018.
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Kimberly Campbell, Judge.
Daniel Lytle, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Ratliff v. State, 914 So. 2d 938 (Fla. 2005); Adaway v.
State, 902 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 2005); Hanf v. State, 182 So. 3d 704 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015);
Enriquez v. State, 885 So. 2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).
KHOUZAM, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DANIEL LYTLE v. STATE OF FLORIDA (DANIEL LYTLE v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.