Daniel Luke Meier v. Amanda Megan Berger

Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided September 27, 2018·No. 336946·Unpublished

Opinion

STATE OF MICHIGAN

COURT OF APPEALS

DANIEL LUKE MEIER, UNPUBLISHED September 27, 2018 Plaintiff-Appellant,

v No. 336946 Wayne Circuit Court AMANDA MEGAN BERGER and ALLSTATE LC No. 16-006718-NI PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees.

Before: CAVANAGH, P.J., and STEPHENS and SWARTZLE, JJ.

STEPHENS, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

I write to concur with the majority on all issues except as to the dismissal for failure to provide discovery. I would find that failure to address the Duray standards leaves this Court to speculate as to the trial court’s reasons to exercise the extraordinary and draconian sanction of dismissal for failure to provide discovery. Duray Dev, LLC v Perrin, 288 Mich App 143, 165; 792 NW2d 749 (2010). However, since the complaint was properly dismissed under MCR 2.116(C)(7), that error does not warrant reversal.

/s/ Cynthia Diane Stephens

-1-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniel Luke Meier v. Amanda Megan Berger, (Mich. Ct. App. 2018).

Daniel Luke Meier v. Amanda Megan Berger (Daniel Luke Meier v. Amanda Megan Berger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duray Development, LLC v. Perrin
792 N.W.2d 749 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2010)